๐Ÿšš on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.1/5 from 979+ reviews
Vintageโœ“ In Stock๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller 

Indian Pakistani outfit

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…4.1 out of 5(979 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$45
$75
Sale
โœ“ at no charge fulfillment on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

exquisite three piece outfit with silk large dupatta n sharara style pants used once

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
immediate Shipping
โ†ฉ๏ธ
effortless Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

Indian Pakistani outfit

charming three piece outfit with silk large dupatta n sharara style pants used once

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 1016598

Category: Vintage > Supplies > Fabric

Original Price:$75 USD

Sale Price:$45 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand recent

๐Ÿšš shipment & Returns

โœ“ at no charge delivery on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.1
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 3214 reviews
AR
Aaron Roberts โœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago ยท Raleigh, NC
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
impeccable in every way
So far, the Indian Pakistani outfit feels solid which is good enough. Nothing fancy.
18 people found this helpful
SM
Sarah Miller โœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago ยท Fresno, CA​
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Impressed!
After several use, it works fine and Iโ€™m satisfied.
40 people found this helpful
LN
Lauren Nelson โœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago ยท Portland, OR
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Super happy
After various use, the Indian Pakistani outfit works fine so no complaints.
9 people found this helpful
DA
David Anderson โœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago ยท Indianapolis, IN

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
astonishing quality
To be fair, it does the job so no complaints.
26 people found this helpful
SM
Sarah Miller โœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago ยท Cincinnati, OH
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
A+ quality
the Indian Pakistani outfit works well enough which is good enough.
17 people found this helpful