๐Ÿšš on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.2/5 from 674+ reviews
Vintageโœ“ In Stock๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller 

34" strand of vintage Crystal quartz

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…4.2 out of 5(674 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$34
$56.67
Sale
โœ“ at no charge fulfillment on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

Check out this exquisite 34-in strand of vintage crystal quartz you guys

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
immediate Shipping
โ†ฉ๏ธ
effortless Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

34" strand of vintage Crystal quartz

Check out this charming 34-in strand of vintage crystal quartz you guys

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 1750383

Category: Vintage > Supplies > Chain

Original Price:$56.67 USD

Sale Price:$34 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand recent

๐Ÿšš shipment & Returns

โœ“ at no charge delivery on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.2
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 3191 reviews
NH
Nicole Harris โœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago ยท Cleveland, OH
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
superb choice
it feels okay which is good enough.
47 people found this helpful
JW
Jennifer Wilson โœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago ยท brand-new York, NY
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
terrific value for money
So far, it works well enough and it works for me. Packaging was basic.
10 people found this helpful
JD​
John Davidson
11 months ago ยท Miami, FL
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
So glad I bought this
After a few days, the 34" strand of vintage Crystal quartz works as described and it works for me. Works fine so far.
13 people found this helpful
MR
Matthew Robinson โœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago ยท Tulsa, OK
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
exceptionally pleased
To be fair, it feels solid enough so Iโ€™m okay with it.
38 people found this helpful
AH
Andrew Hall
11 months ago ยท Dallas, TX

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
appreciate it!
The 34" strand of vintage Crystal quartz does not feel overcomplicated.
34 people found this helpful